A front page news analysis of the Republican debate reports, "Across the stage, each of the seven men — whether they were pro-Trump or anti-Trump — wore dark suits, white shirts and red ties. It's a uniform frequently favored by another man. One who wasn't there."
In fact Senator Scott was not wearing a white shirt; his shirt was a pale or sky blue. (A different Times article available online indeed acknowledges that Scott's shirt was "white-ish blue."
When you can't even trust the Times to tell you reliably, in a front page article published more than 24 hours after the debate, what color shirts the Republican candidates were wearing, what signal does it send about the veracity and carefulness of the rest of the paper's political coverage. Who edits this stuff? Did they watch the debate? Come on, guys. The Times reporter whose byline is on the inaccurate article, Lisa Lerer, has a previous history of shepherding inaccuracies into the paper.