A Times editorial on President Obama's Israel speech asserts, "In recent years, Israel has built so many settlements that the options for finding a two-state solution are dwindling."
The Times gives no evidence to back up this claim, which appears predicated on the strange assumption that a Palestinian Arab state would not allow Jews to live within its borders. It also suggests, falsely, that the main obstacle to a two-state solution is Israeli settlements, rather than, say, refusal by the Palestinian Arabs to accept Israel's existence as a Jewish state.
Another sentence in the Times editorial also deals with the settlement issue: "We should note that rockets were fired from Gaza into southern Israel on Thursday — a reckless and provocative act — while the Israelis showed good faith by avoiding the sorts of defiant acts, like announcing new settlements, that have marred American visits in the past." This draws a kind of parallel between shooting rockets aimed to kill Israeli civilians and building homes for Jewish Israelis. It's a false equivalence, because one is an act of terrorism and another is something that there is nothing wrong with.