A dispatch from Pittsburgh reports that President Obama "called angrily for Iran to release Americans who are being held prisoner there."
How does the Times know whether Mr. Obama is genuinely angry or just feigning anger? I'd prefer if the Times limited itself to describing what a reporter can see or hear — a politician raising his voice, pounding the podium, clenching his jaw, uttering profanities, or getting red in the face — rather than making assumptions or drawing conclusions about the politician's underlying emotional state of mind. They are all pretty good actors or they wouldn't have gotten to that level.
And that's not even getting into the question of racial stereotypes that describing Mr. Obama as "angry" might raise.