From a Times news article on a meeting between President Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu:
While Mr. Obama was reassuring Mr. Netanyahu in private, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. delivered a rousing declaration of American support for Israel to J Street, a moderate pro-Israel lobbying group that favors a two-state solution to the conflict.
This is a classic Times "framing" issue. To a lot of members of moderate pro-Israel lobbying groups like, say, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, J Street doesn't seem either moderate or particularly pro-Israel. A Zionist Organization of America report, for example, describes J Street as "a far left organization" and concludes, "in terms of the policies and positions it adopts, J Street is much more closely aligned to those hostile to Israel, especially anti-Israel Arabs and Muslims, rather than to those supportive of Israel." But if one is as far left and anti-Israel as the Times reporters and editors apparently are, J Street looks like "a moderate pro-Israel lobbying group."
In situations such as this, the Times would be better off either dropping the characterization or attributing it, or sticking to facts rather than characterizations.